Strengthening Economic Learning Based on Deep Learning to Improve Financial Literacy of SMAN Tondano Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62794/je3s.v7i4.440Keywords:
Financial literacy, Digital financial literacy, Economics education, SOLO taxonomy, Deep learningAbstract
Digital financial services expand adolescents' transactional convenience while exposing them to credit, fraud, privacy, and impulsive-consumption risks. This exploratory qualitative study examined how students in three public senior high schools in Tondano, Indonesia, organize economic concepts when reasoning about everyday financial decisions and what these patterns imply for deep learning-oriented economics instruction. Thirty students completed open-ended problem-based tasks used to map variation in conceptual structure; 15 were then purposively selected for semi-structured interviews and think-aloud activities. Data were organized in NVivo and analyzed thematically, with the Structure of Observed Learning Outcomes (SOLO) taxonomy used to interpret structural complexity and thematic-network mapping used to represent relationships among analytic domains. The findings indicate that students could identify saving, consumption, investment, and risk concepts but often treated them as disconnected elements rather than integrated decision rules. Operational familiarity with QRIS, e-wallets, and paylater did not consistently include recognition of fees, debt, fraud, or digital-security risks. Peer and promotional contexts shaped spending considerations, while experiential reflection and self-regulatory practices appeared to support more connected reasoning. The study does not test a Deep Learning intervention; instead, it provides a diagnostic basis for designing economics tasks that require students to relate concepts, justify trade-offs, evaluate digital risks, and transfer principles to new situations.
References
Adeniji, S. M., Baker, P., & Schmude, M. (2022). Structure of the observed learning outcomes (SOLO) model: A mixed-method systematic review of research in mathematics education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(6), em2119. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12087
Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: An analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 385–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410100100307
Biggs, J. B., & Collis, K. F. (1982). Evaluating the quality of learning: The SOLO taxonomy (Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome). Academic Press.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
Chi, M. T. H., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 49(4), 219–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.965823
Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791
Freed, P. G., & Hackney, J. (2026). Financial literacy and financial crime: A regression discontinuity approach. Journal of Financial Economics, 181, 104292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2026.104292
Frisancho, V. (2023). Is school-based financial education effective? Immediate and long-lasting impacts on high school students. The Economic Journal, 133(651), 1147–1180. https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/ueac084
Hattie, J. A. C., & Donoghue, G. M. (2016). Learning strategies: A synthesis and conceptual model. npj Science of Learning, 1, 16013. https://doi.org/10.1038/npjscilearn.2016.13
Hennink, M., & Kaiser, B. N. (2022). Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Social Science & Medicine, 292, 114523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523
Kaiser, T., & Menkhoff, L. (2022). Active learning improves financial education: Experimental evidence from Uganda. Journal of Development Economics, 157, 102870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2022.102870
Kaiser, T., Lusardi, A., Menkhoff, L., & Urban, C. (2022). Financial education affects financial knowledge and downstream behaviors. Journal of Financial Economics, 145(2), 255–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.09.022
Koskelainen, T., Kalmi, P., Scornavacca, E., & Vartiainen, T. (2023). Financial literacy in the digital age: A research agenda. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 57(1), 507–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12510
Kovač, V. B., Nome, D. Ø., Jensen, A. R., & Skreland, L. L. (2025). The why, what and how of deep learning: Critical analysis and additional concerns. Education Inquiry, 16(2), 237–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2023.2194502
Laturette, K., Widianingsih, L. P., & Subandi, L. (2021). Financial literacy in Generation Z. Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi (JPAK), 9(1), 131–139.
Lusardi, A., & Mitchell, O. S. (2014). The economic importance of financial literacy: Theory and evidence. Journal of Economic Literature, 52(1), 5–44. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.52.1.5
Malik, S. I., Tawafak, R. M., & Shakir, M. (2021). Aligning and assessing teaching approaches with SOLO taxonomy in a computer programming course. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 17(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJICTE.20211001.oa5
Noveiri Delshad, N., ap Gwilym, O., Parry, S., & Rimmer, C. (2026). FinTech and financial literacy: An exploratory study of international students in the UK. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-11-2025-0950
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 assessment and analytical framework.
OECD. (2024). PISA 2022 results (Volume IV): How financially smart are students?
OECD. (2025). Supporting informed and safe use of digital payments through digital financial literacy. https://doi.org/10.1787/21de47d1-en
Otoritas Jasa Keuangan, & Badan Pusat Statistik. (2025, May 2). Indeks literasi dan inklusi keuangan masyarakat meningkat: OJK dan BPS umumkan hasil Survei Nasional Literasi dan Inklusi Keuangan (SNLIK) Tahun 2025. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan.
Pak, T.-Y., Chatterjee, S., & Choung, Y. (2026). Navigating digital finance: How digital financial literacy influences digital financial services use and benefits in Korea. Financial Innovation, 12, 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-025-00820-w
Rehman, K., & Mia, M. A. (2024). Determinants of financial literacy: A systematic review and future research directions. Future Business Journal, 10, 75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-024-00365-x
Rengkuan, M., Wicaksono, A. G. C., Hasmiati, & Watung, F. A. (2026). Investigating the role of financial literacy in supporting entrepreneurship skills among high school students. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 13, 102874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.102874
Sabri, M. F., Trinugroho, I., Magli, A. S., Law, S. H., Wahyono, B., Ridhwan, M. M., & Septianto, F. (2026). Bridging digital capabilities and financial resilience: A comparative study of FinTech, AI literacy, and financial inclusion among households in Malaysia and Indonesia. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 12(2), 100759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2026.100759
Silinskas, G., Ahonen, A. K., & Wilska, T.-A. (2023). School and family environments promote adolescents' financial confidence: Indirect paths to financial literacy skills in Finnish PISA 2018. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 57(1), 593–618. https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12513
Wu, X.-Y. (2024). Exploring the effects of digital technology on deep learning: A meta-analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 29(1), 425–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12307-1
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Vinda Afnita, Dominikus Rojoki Manullang, Iis Azelya

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.