Stimullus, Capability, Ego, and Fraudulent Financial Statement: The Role of Audit Quality

Authors

  • Helmiansyah Irawan Doctoral Program in Economics, Universitas Trisakti, Kota Jakarta Barat, Indonesia
  • Fidelia Ifeyinwa Nzekwe Chinwuko Department of Public Administration, Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu University, Igbariam, Anambra State, Nigeria
  • Khomsiyah Doctoral Program in Economics, Universitas Trisakti, Kota Jakarta Barat, Indonesia
  • Titik Aryati Doctoral Program in Economics, Universitas Trisakti, Kota Jakarta Barat, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62794/je3s.v7i1.12

Keywords:

Fraudulent financial statement, stimulus, capability, ego, audit quality

Abstract

Financial statement fraud remains a critical issue that threatens corporate transparency and investor confidence. This study aims to examine the influence of stimulus, capability, and ego on fraudulent financial statements and to analyze the moderating role of audit quality. The research is based on the Fraud Hexagon Theory, Agency Theory, and Positive Accounting Theory, which explain how managerial pressure, authority, and behavioral characteristics may influence financial reporting manipulation. The study uses panel data from non-financial companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during the 2023–2024 period. A total of 344 firm-year observations were analyzed using purposive sampling. The data were analyzed using Moderated Regression Analysis (MRA) with panel data estimation. The results indicate that stimulus and capability have a positive and significant effect on fraudulent financial statements, suggesting that financial pressure and managerial authority increase the likelihood of financial reporting manipulation. However, ego does not significantly influence fraudulent financial statements. Furthermore, audit quality is found to weaken the positive relationship between stimulus and fraudulent financial statements, indicating that high-quality audits can mitigate the impact of financial pressure on fraudulent reporting behavior. However, audit quality does not significantly moderate the relationship between capability and ego with fraudulent financial statements. This study contributes to the fraud literature by providing empirical evidence on the role of fraud determinants and audit quality in explaining fraudulent financial reporting in emerging markets.

References

Achmad, T., Faisal, F., & Ghozali, I. (2022). Fraud hexagon and financial statement fraud: Evidence from Indonesian listed companies. Journal of Accounting and Investment, 23(2), 278–295. https://doi.org/10.18196/jai.v23i2

Adekoya, O. B., Olabisi, J., & Ogundipe, A. (2021). Audit quality and financial reporting reliability: Evidence from emerging markets. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 19(3), 421–438. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-2020

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Andrew, J., Baker, M., & Guthrie, J. (2022). Fraud detection and corporate governance: Emerging issues in financial reporting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 35(6), 1463–1485. https://doi.org/10.1108

Ayati, S., & Mulya, A. (2024). Financial pressure and fraudulent financial reporting: Evidence from emerging markets. Journal of Financial Crime, 31(1), 210–225. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-2023

Byrd, J. W., Parrino, R., & Pritsch, G. (2010). Stockholder–manager conflicts and firm value. Financial Analysts Journal, 54(3), 14–30.

Chandra, E., Lastanti, H. S., & Umar, H. (2023). Fraud detection using the fraud hexagon model in financial reporting. International Journal of Financial Research, 14(2), 112–126.

Cressey, D. R. (1953). Other people’s money: A study in the social psychology of embezzlement. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

Crowe, H. (2011). The fraud pentagon: Considering the five elements of fraud. Crowe Horwath International.

DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(81)90002-1

Erdoğan, M., & Erdoğan, E. O. (2020). Beneish M-score and financial statement manipulation detection. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 21(3), 513–528.

Faris, A., Achmad, T., & Harto, P. (2022). Fraud hexagon and financial statement fraud detection. Journal of Financial Crime, 29(4), 1240–1255. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-2021

Gujarati, D. N., & Porter, D. C. (2015). Basic econometrics (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Education.

Harris, K., & Williams, J. (2020). Audit quality and financial reporting transparency: Evidence from global capital markets. International Journal of Auditing, 24(2), 215–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12194

Herusetya, A. (2012). Audit quality measurement and auditor independence. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia, 9(2), 117–133.

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

Jogiyanto, H. M. (2017). Metodologi penelitian bisnis: Salah kaprah dan pengalaman-pengalaman (6th ed.). Yogyakarta: BPFE.

Lastanti, H. S., Murwaningsari, E., & Umar, H. (2022). Fraud hexagon and financial statement fraud detection in emerging markets. Journal of Financial Crime, 29(3), 927–944. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-2021

Meitasir, M., Achmad, T., & Faisal, F. (2022). The influence of fraud hexagon on fraudulent financial reporting. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 7(4), 345–359.

Nachrowi, N. D., & Usman, H. (2018). Pendekatan populer dan praktis ekonometrika untuk analisis ekonomi dan keuangan. Jakarta: Lembaga Penerbit FE UI.

Rajgopal, S., Srinivasan, S., & Zheng, X. (2021). Measuring audit quality. Review of Accounting Studies, 26(2), 559–619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-020-09556-1

Sukmadilaga, C., Pratama, A., & Mulyani, S. (2022). Determinants of fraudulent financial reporting using the fraud hexagon model. International Journal of Financial Research, 13(4), 312–325. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijfr.v13n4p312

Vousinas, G. L. (2019). Advancing theory of fraud: The S.C.O.R.E. model (Fraud Hexagon). Journal of Financial Crime, 26(1), 372–381. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-12-2017-0128

Watts, R. L., & Zimmerman, J. L. (1986). Positive accounting theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Wolfe, D. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2004). The fraud diamond: Considering the four elements of fraud. CPA Journal, 74(12), 38–42.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-15

How to Cite

Irawan, H., Chinwuko, F. I. N., Khomsiyah, & Titik Aryati. (2026). Stimullus, Capability, Ego, and Fraudulent Financial Statement: The Role of Audit Quality. Journal of Economic Education and Entrepreneurship Studies, 7(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.62794/je3s.v7i1.12

Issue

Section

Articles