Innovative Social Problem Solving as a Determinant of Student Social Entrepreneurial Aspiration in Malaysia

Authors

  • Norizan Azizan Albukhary International University
  • Ceesay Ousman Albukhary International University
  • Abdullah Aiyash Raja Muhammad Kuwait University
  • Abubakar Ali Muhammad Albukhary International University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62794/pjer.v4i2.457

Keywords:

Innovative social problem solving, Social entrepreneurial aspiration, social entrepreneurship, Higher education, Malaysia

Abstract

Although socially innovative capacities are relevant to entrepreneurship education, their association with students' pre-venture social entrepreneurial aspirations remains insufficiently examined. This study examines the relationship between innovative social problem solving (ISPS) and student social entrepreneurial aspiration (SSEA) among higher education students in Northern Malaysia. A quantitative cross-sectional online survey was conducted in Kedah, Penang, Perak, and Perlis using purposive and convenience recruitment. Of 310 submitted records, 220 complete cases were analysed after consent, eligibility, and completeness screening, including the exclusion of 76 otherwise eligible records with incomplete aspiration items. Researcher-adapted five-point Likert measures were analysed using descriptive statistics, Cronbach's alpha, Pearson correlation, and simple linear regression. HC3 heteroscedasticity-consistent standard errors were applied following a significant Breusch-Pagan test. Mean ISPS scores were above the scale midpoint (M = 3.41), whereas SSEA scores were below it (M = 2.34). ISPS was positively associated with SSEA (r = .371, p < .001). The regression coefficient was positive (B = .404), and the model explained 13.8% of the observed variation in SSEA (R² = .138). The association remained statistically significant under HC3 inference (p < .001). These findings identify socially innovative problem-solving orientation as a correlate of pre-venture social entrepreneurial aspiration, complementing research on psychological and educational antecedents. However, the findings do not demonstrate causal effects or the effectiveness of educational interventions. Generalisability and interpretation are constrained by non-probability sampling, limited psychometric validation, and exclusions due to incomplete aspiration items.

References

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Al Issa, H.-E., Thai, M. T. T., & Saad, S. (2025). Empowering social entrepreneurial intentions through experiential learning and self-efficacy. The International Journal of Management Education, 23(2), Article 101154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2025.101154

Bergner, S., Palmer, C., Devaney, M., & Kruse, P. (2022). A framework for antecedents of social entrepreneurial intention: Empirical evidence and research agenda. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 988851. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.988851

Breusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. (1979). A simple test for heteroscedasticity and random coefficient variation. Econometrica, 47(5), 1287–1294. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911963

Bulut, C., Eren, H., & Halac, D. S. (2013). Social innovation and psychometric analysis. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 82, 122–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.235

Eysenbach, G. (2004). Improving the quality of web surveys: The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES). Journal of Medical Internet Research, 6(3), Article e34. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6.3.e34

Flake, J. K., Pek, J., & Hehman, E. (2017). Construct validation in social and personality research: Current practice and recommendations. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 370–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617693063

Glasserman-Morales, L. D., Alcantar-Nieblas, C., & Nava-Lara, S. (2024). The social innovation profile in students as a transformation strategy: Structural equation modeling. Frontiers in Education, 9, Article 1336576. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1336576

Hayes, A. F., & Cai, L. (2007). Using heteroskedasticity-consistent standard error estimators in OLS regression: An introduction and software implementation. Behavior Research Methods, 39(4), 709–722. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192961

Hockerts, K. (2018). The effect of experiential social entrepreneurship education on intention formation in students. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 9(3), 234–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2018.1498377

Ip, C. Y. (2025). Fostering social entrepreneurship in university students: The moderating role of entrepreneurial creativity. Studies in Higher Education, 50(6), 1104–1122. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2024.2362958

Krueger, N. F., Jr., Reilly, M. D., & Carsrud, A. L. (2000). Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5–6), 411–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(98)00033-0

Luc, P. T., Lan, P. X., Anh, B. N. T., & Cuong, D. T. (2021). The effect of risk-taking propensity on social entrepreneurial

intention: Evidence from Vietnam. Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science - Economics and Business Administration, 11(1), 73–82. https://doi.org/10.46223/HCMCOUJS.econ.en.11.1.543.2021

Lyu, X., Al Mamun, A., Yang, Q., & Abd Aziz, N. (2024). Social entrepreneurial intention among university students in China. Scientific Reports, 14, Article 7362. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-58060-4

MacKinnon, J. G., & White, H. (1985). Some heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimators with improved finite sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 29(3), 305–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(85)90158-7

Mair, J., & Martí, I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2005.09.002

Mair, J., & Noboa, E. (2006). Social entrepreneurship: How intentions to create a social venture are formed. In J. Mair, J. Robinson, & K. Hockerts (Eds.), Social entrepreneurship (pp. 121–135). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230625655_8

Mulgan, G. (2006). The process of social innovation. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 1(2), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1162/itgg.2006.1.2.145

Muñoz-Valle, J. F., Estrada-Pereira, L., Turrubiates-Hernández, F. J., Vizcaíno-Quirarte, A. M., & Ruvalcaba-Romero, N. A. (2025). Validation of the Social Innovation Tendency Scale in Mexico. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 15(10), Article 195. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe15100195

Mustapha, N. D., Tajuddin, N. I. I., Zainordin, N. A., Mohd Nasir, N. F., & Mohamed, S. S. (2026). From intelligence to innovation: How intelligence quotient (IQ) and entrepreneurial intentions (EI) shape social innovation readiness in Malaysian higher education? International Journal of Innovation and Industrial Revolution, 8(24), 152–173.

https://doi.org/10.35631/IJIREV.824010

Naveed, M., Zia, M. Q., Younis, S., & Shah, Z. A. (2021). Relationship of individual social entrepreneurial orientations and intentions: Role of social entrepreneurship education. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 15(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJIE-07-2020-0118

Phills, J. A., Jr., Deiglmeier, K., & Miller, D. T. (2008). Rediscovering social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 6(4), 34–43. https://doi.org/10.48558/GBJY-GJ47

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879

Satar, M. S., & Natasha, S. (2019). Individual social entrepreneurship orientation: Towards development of a measurement scale. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 13(1), 49–72. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJIE-09-2018-0052

Saufi, R. A., & Hong, T. W. (2024). Malaysia: The effects of attitude, subjective norms, and social entrepreneurship awareness toward social entrepreneurship intention among public university students. In A. H. Verkuil (Ed.), Start-up cultures in times of global crises (pp. 161–181). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53942-8_10

Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd

van Wijk, J., Zietsma, C., Dorado, S., de Bakker, F. G. A., & Martí, I. (2019). Social innovation: Integrating micro, meso, and macro level insights from institutional theory. Business & Society, 58(5), 887–918. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650318789104

von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., & Vandenbroucke, J. P. (2007). The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. PLOS Medicine, 4(10), Article e296. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040296

Yellangan Koval, G., Piaralal, S. K., Zulkefli, N. A., Raghavan, S., & Pooventeran, A. (2025). Drivers of social entrepreneurial intention: Evidence from a Malaysian higher education context. International Journal of Business and Technopreneurship, 15(3), 333–348. https://doi.org/10.58915/ijbt.v15i3.2394

Zaremohzzabieh, Z., Ahrari, S., Krauss, S. E., Samah, A. A., Meng, L. K., & Ariffin, Z. (2019). Predicting social entrepreneurial intention: A meta-analytic path analysis based on the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Business Research, 96, 264–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.11.030

Zulkifle, A. M., & Aziz, K. A. (2023). Determinants of social entrepreneurship intention: A longitudinal study among youth in higher learning institutions. Social Sciences, 12(3), Article 124. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12030124

Downloads

Published

2026-06-29